[H-PAD] H-PAD--A CALL TO ACTION

[Andor Skotnes]

[image: image.png]



*Historians for Peace and Democracy*





*A CALL TO ACTION*

*American democracy is under attack as never before – and educators at
every level are on the front lines of the new culture wars.*



Reactionary and opportunistic politicians and operatives tied to the
Republican party hope to mobilize voters in 2022 by demonizing efforts to
combat the racism and other forms of oppression that have deformed
America’s past. In more than twenty states, they have already banned
teaching about racism and other “controversial issues.” Worse than
McCarthyism, these educational gag rules are an unprecedented assault on
academic freedom and historical reality.

*We must act NOW!* We cannot stand by and let politicians distort the truth.



*1. What are we asking?*

As right-wing attacks on educators spread across the United States, we call
on faculty members to take collective action by urging their university
senates or similar official bodies to pass resolutions asking their
administrators and trustees to join them in upholding academic freedom.We
are supporting a campaign organized by the African American Policy Forum
(AAPF)to promote a resolution entitled “Defending Academic Freedom to Teach
About Race and Gender Justice and Critical Race Theory” that we hope
faculties will customize for their campuses.



*2. How does the AAPF’s campaign operate?*

            This is a national effort designed to show that the academic
community is united in its opposition to the current culture wars. As
members of the Historians for Peace and Democracy, we urge all our fellow
historians and other concerned colleagues to join the AAPF’s campaign to
encourage their Faculty Senates or other official bodies to pass
resolutions that not only oppose the educational gag rules but also ask
their trustees and administrators to support that opposition.

            This project is enormously appealing because it stimulates
collective action on the part of faculty members, who ordinarily tend to
remain passive about threats to academic freedom and governance until they
confront a crisis at their own schools. Taking a stand against the current
right-wing attack on the teaching of controversial issues should not be a
hard sell. Today’s culture wars are such a blatant violation of the
academy’s values that a measure enabling the academic community to express
its disapproval of them should gain considerable traction.



*3. Why should we pass these resolutions if our own institutions are not
threatened?*

Besides ramping up the academy’s general opposition to these repressive
measures, the resolutions have the advantage of enhancing faculty
governance by showing administrators and trustees that their faculties are
willing to act collectively on the issue. Accordingly, even before a crisis
develops on the campus, adopting such a resolution by an official faculty
body should make an institution’s leaders think twice about responding to
outside pressure before taking a repressive action that could trigger a
strong faculty pushback. This is what happened last fall when the University
of Florida administration <https://www.chronicle.com/article/im-speechless>
’seffort to keep several professors from testifying before the state
legislature encountered immediate resistance within the university, created
a national tsunami of outrage, and cost the U-F’s president his job.



*4. Are the Faculty Senate resolutions effective?*

              Even as we write, the AAPF’s campaign – spearheaded by a trio
of AAPF and AAUP activists -- is beginning to make an impact, as a recent
article from *Inside Higher Ed*
<https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2021/12/15/professors-promote-resolution-academic-freedom?utm_source=Inside+Higher+Ed&utm_campaign=75e7be1b76-DNU_2021_COPY_02&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_1fcbc04421-75e7be1b76-236860198&mc_cid=75e7be1b76&mc_eid=337cc28bcb>
reveals. Already the faculty senates at nine universities – Ball State,
DePaul, Ohio State, Portland State, and the universities of Alabama,
Colorado, Delaware, Minnesota, and Oregon – have passed the resolutions and
had them affirmed by the administrations. The Molloy College senate also
adopted the resolution, though the administration did not accept it.
Meanwhile, faculty groups at several other institutions – Boston
University, the California Faculty Association, Stanford, and the
universities of California-Riverside, Georgia, Massachusetts-Lowell,
Mississippi, Rhode Island, South Carolina, and Texas-Austin, among them –
have responded favorably. Their resolutions are progressing through the
system and will probably be acted on in the spring.

            These actions represent significant victories. At the
University of Colorado, for example, the resolution
<https://www.colorado.edu/today/2021/11/05/bfa-approves-faculty-council-resolution-against-external-limits-academic-discourse>s
passed overwhelmingly by the system-wide Faculty Council and the Boulder
Faculty General Assembly prevented the Board of Regents from adopting a
wide-ranging measure to ban nine controversial concepts dealing with race,
ethnicity, or gender from the university’s training and academic programs.



*5. How can I help launch this campaign?*

            Spread the word! Contact as many friends and sympathetic
colleagues as possible in your department, union local, AAUP chapter, or
other faculty group to ask your Faculty Senate or other official body to
pass such a resolution. Reach out as well to your networks of colleagues at
other colleges and universities. The more people involved, the stronger
your voice will be.

            You do not have to reinvent the wheel. Here are some sample
resolutions and other materials that you can copy and/or alter to fit the
needs of your own institution. The Minnesota Resolution
<https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ui=2&ik=b1f6188128&attid=0.1&permmsgid=msg-f:1719420827878248531&th=17dc9c2211175053&view=att&disp=safe&realattid=f_kxar7ctm0>,
for example, is particularly cogent and might be a useful template for
other faculty groups to crib from along with the other documents
<https://www.aapf.org/truthbetold-call-to-action> and templates that the
AAPF campaign has produced and posted on its website. If you would like
additional background information, see the excellent recent PEN report
<https://pen.org/report/educational-gag-orders/?mc_cid=d63b911a14&mc_eid=75f937780cHi,>
.

Finally, if you have any questions, please contact Jennifer Ruth
<https://www.pdx.edu/profile/jennifer-ruth>, professor of film studies at
Portland State University, Emily Houh <http://emily.houh@uc.edu>, professor
of law at University of Cincinnati, or Valerie Johnson,
<http://valerie.c.johnson@depaul.edu> professor of political science at
DePaul University.



In solidarity,

Molly Nolan <mn4 at nyu.edu>, Margaret Power <marmacpower1 at gmail.com>, Ellen
Schrecker <ellen.schrecker at gmail.com>

For the Steering Committee of the Historians for Peace and Democracy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.historiansforpeace.org/private.cgi/h-pad-historiansforpeace.org/attachments/20220118/50014cff/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 12651 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.historiansforpeace.org/private.cgi/h-pad-historiansforpeace.org/attachments/20220118/50014cff/attachment-0002.png>